(Or could R2-D2 quietly tip the UK into a dystopian hellscape?)
Every week there’s a new headline.
“AI WILL REPLACE 3 MILLION JOBS.”
“ROBOT OUTPERFORMS DOCTORS.”
“CHATGPT NOW MAKES BETTER TEA THAN YOU.”
Cheery stuff.
It’s easy to laugh it off. After all, we’ve been promised robot revolutions before. No one’s seen Arnold Schwarzenegger marching down Whitehall demanding our clothes, boots, and motorcycles. Yet, the absolute risk facing the UK economy isn’t Skynet, killer robots, or science fiction fantasies.
It’s something far more mundane and much more severe.
You can’t tax robots.
And the government is only just starting to realise that problem.
A Workforce That’s Shrinking… and Doesn’t Breathe
The UK labour market is already under strain.
We’re seeing:
-
Rising unemployment
-
Falling payroll numbers
-
Redundancies trending upwards
-
A mild recession murmuring in the background
-
AI is steadily replacing roles once thought “safe”
Administration. Customer service. Junior analysts. Paralegals. Even parts of medicine and law. Could you add that to the tax system?
Who Pays for the Country?
Humans pay:
-
Income tax
-
National Insurance
-
VAT (because we actually spend money)
-
Council tax
-
Fuel duty (every time we wince at the pump)
Robots pay:
-
Nothing
-
Not even a polite “out of office” email
If an automated system replaces 200 office jobs, that isn’t 200 people retraining overnight. It’s 200 PAYE streams disappearing... Economists regularly warn that around 9% of UK jobs could be automated in the coming years. That’s roughly three million workers.
In a country already struggling to fund public services, this represents a serious and growing gap.
Not Evil. Just… Consequences.
Will robots deliberately collapse the economy? No. They don’t have motives. But indirectly? Absolutely.
Because when:
- Income tax falls
-
National Insurance receipts shrink
-
Consumer spending weakens
-
Welfare spending rises
-
Deficits widen
Something has to give, and historically, when governments face shrinking tax bases, they don’t shrug and say “never mind”.
They look elsewhere.
Where money is visible.
Where it’s easy to monitor.
Where it’s digital.
Savings...
Pensions...
Digital assets...
Electronic money... see where I am going with this?
Robots quietly escape the tax net.
Humans do not.
The Terminator isn’t the problem.
HMRC is realising it can’t tax him.
A Quiet Economic Shift
Picture this.
A robot replaces a team of 40 workers.
The company becomes more profitable.
The economy loses 40 taxpayers.
Those robots:
-
Don’t file self-assessment returns
-
Don’t buy Pret sandwiches
-
Don’t take out mortgages
-
Don’t spend Saturdays in B&Q
-
Don’t keep the high street alive
They… work. Efficiently. Silently. Relentlessly.
A recession driven by falling employment and a shrinking tax base is a far more realistic dystopia than anything Hollywood has dreamed up. Unlike the films, no John Connor is arriving on a motorbike to save the day.
Meanwhile, Gold Just… Exists
In the corner of all this sits physical gold, quietly unbothered. Digital chaos? Automation anxiety? Tax confusion, Central bank firefighting?
Gold doesn’t care.
It doesn’t care if:
-
Robots replace accountants
-
Governments struggle to fund themselves
-
AI creates financial instability
-
Digital money becomes ever more monitored
-
The grid goes down
-
C-3PO becomes Chancellor
Gold has never needed:
-
A server
-
A battery
-
An update
-
A login
-
Or special effects
It simply exists. And for over 5,000 years, that has been enough.
A Final Thought
This isn’t about panic.
It’s about awareness.
In a world where technology accelerates faster than tax systems can adapt, and where humans remain visible while machines quietly replace them, it’s reasonable to think about where control really sits.
Owning something outside the digital system isn’t paranoia. It’s perspective. If this topic has made you stop and think, that’s the point.
Read. Question. Learn.
And if you want to explore how physical gold fits into this changing world, have the conversation.
No pressure. No advice. Just clarity.
